Festival Cultural de Mayo Jalisco 2009
Inicio
Bienvenida
Programa General
Japón, País Invitado
Jalisco, Anfitrión
Patrocinadores
Festivales Anteriores
Sedes Venta de boletos Únete al Festival Envía tus comentarios sobre el festival Contacto

| Programa general | Instituto Cultural Cabañas |

Tuesday 19
Exhibition Opening

“Parallel Japan”
Contemporary Japanese Architecture 1996 - 2006
Fotography, Mockups
From May 19 to June 7

Instituto Cultural Cabañas

Parallel Japan

Contemporary Japanese Architecture 1996-2006

Riichi Miyake
Professor of Architectural History, Keio University

Architecture offers perhaps the most concrete index of a given country or region’s social circumstances and cultural maturity. Starting from dwellings, the most basic unit for human subsistence, then expanding to schools, hospitals and various other public facilities, to offices and shops, and even further to parks and plazas, architecture takes up an increasingly vast range of projects whose construction and use may be understood to relate to that town or region’s vision in social design. In order to clarify such relations between society and architecture, this Parallel Japan exhibition looks at buildings completed on Japanese soil over the last decade as well as at buildings realized by Japanese architects abroad. These years have seen structural changes in Japanese society in response to the shift from so-called “Bubble” to “Post-Bubble” economies; likewise, as policy making veered away from the twentieth-century expanding city toward a twenty-first century continuous-city model, the move has been to effectively draw upon whatever attributes of long-standing heritage to the pursuit of new directions in value creation.

Of course the visions of society sought by Tokyo and by other regions during these transition years have been completely different: where the one pushed for truly globalized, cosmopolitan connectivity, the others assumed discrete, compact identities by which the local population might resist becoming wholly sidelined. And the image of architecture has diverged commensurately in contrast to big, brash cultural monuments that aspire to a world’s record stature, we see region-specific community facilities finely attuned to the needs of the elderly and returning native sons; instead of city center promenades glittering with foreign brand name boutiques, we find local shopping streets that actively preserve some traditional flavor; or again in counterpoint to hig-rise urban core redevelopment financially centered on foreign investment and venture capital, we discover low-key community planning established at the grassroots level via cooperative, non-profit initiatives.

Accordingly, these exhibitions intend to compare and showcase these various architectural efforts by means of four thematic sections: City, Life, Culture and Dwelling. In fact by contrasting architectural designs in relation to this cross-sectional view of the Japanese society, we get a more accurate picture of the seemingly disparate realities of Japanese architecture today; we come to a better grasp on the facts that have shaped such diverse and dynamic buildings, the conflux of background factors-real state and finance, cultural agendas and regional governance, technological developments and information systems- addressed by Japanese architects and engineers as they go about deftly transforming social programs. Architecture is a force that informs society through its focused accumulation ok knowledge.

The “Post-bubble” Era and Architecture

Taro Igarashi
Assistant Professor of Architectural History, Tohoku University

Post modernism in Japanese architecture largely coincided with the “Bubble” era, so that as the economy lost momentum, the “fever” for outlandish forms and excesses of ornament also cooled off. Then in 1995 came the Kobe Earthquake bringing Deconstructivist architecture to a halt. Faced with the tragedy of streets strewn with rubble and teetering, collapsed buildings, the prospect of brandishing obtuse theory to underwrite tremor as-metaphor designs seemed altogether inappropriate. Short of a real critique, the mood of the times found cogent reasons in the economic meltdown and natural disaster for making a clean sweep of PoMo and Decon; thereafter, the prevailing mode of design returned decisively to simple, transparent Modernsim. Perhaps the most silent example of this turnaround was Kengo Kuma. Likewise, SANAA and Riken Yamamoto took on Modernist vocabularies in order to develop radical new possibilities for the new era.

“Post-bubble” architects, born since the 1960s, met with drastically fewer jobs as they were embarking on their careers; the ladder of advancement just wasn´t there for them. The members of groups like Atelier Bow.Wow or Mikan, for instance, opted for a collective style rather than each assuming the heroic stance of a solitary auteur architect, and hence they have been called the “Unit School”. Their design strategies have nothing to do with Po Mo dramatics, but rather derive from observing the city and shaping extensions of everyday activities.

Unlike the previous generation they received no commissions for public facilities or commercial buildings. Major constructions firms and famous foreign architects had monopolized large scale urban development, so they inevitably worked mainly in small residences; instead of scrap-and- build methods, they concentrated on renovation schemes, revitalizing existing structures such as old public housing blocks and primary schools. They have even broadened their horizons beyond architecture to become actively involved in art-related events and exhibitions. Another key figure, Tokyo Ito, likewise went beyond mere criticism of “Bubble” era architectural consumerism, asserting that architecture must aspire to further innovation.
His Sendai Mediateque offers a model of information age architecture. More recently, he has utilized computer technologies to create architecture of new geometries and organic ornamentation; his work for fashion-brand boutique projects in Japan has shown especially interesting design experiments. Without succumbing to the pitfalls of the post boom years, Ito has successfully re-invented himself and gone beyond, emerging in the new realm of twenty-first century design.

Urban Cycles
Center and Periphery

With city dwellers counting for more than seven tenths of the total population, urban lifestyles are the norm in Japan. Industry has restructured significantly toward the information and service sectors over the last few decades, just as “bullet trains” and other high-speed infrastructures have greatly facilitated mobility between cities, and yet a declining birthrate, an aging society and regional exodus have in fact adversely affected the vitality of may Japanese cities. Twentieth-century model urban sprawl is already a thing of the past; debate today centers on the prospects for small, decentralized cities in the face of an increasing disparity between different regions: while Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka metropolitan areas of high population density have shown positive growth, other regions across the board have been steadily downsizing their economies. Such circumstances have seen public works played down commensurately, as the era of “national projects” generated by “big government” has given way to one of “small government” urban polices driven by private initiatives. Likewise, in a bold reshuffling of regional autonomies aimed at administrative cost-cutting, the number of local governmental bodies was nearly halved from over 3200 nationwide to some 1800 by 2005.

Although paradoxically, despite the advent of the information age which was to promote decentralization, we clearly see the reverse phenomenon occurring: Tokyo’s urban core is becoming even more densely concentrated, while the whole metropolitan area booming with private enterprise strikes a sharp contrast to outlying regions where public assistance funding barely suffices to keep the local economies afloat. Came the latter half of the 1990s, our major cities overwrought along the lines of late-twentieth century credence in “ function first” began to recover environmental values, while “urban regeneration” policies aimed at revitalizing deteriorated urban core neighborhoods became the order of the day. Along with reassessing regional environmental resources and historic heritage sites, information age networking schemes to promote popular participation became a key part of new urban planning and design. Landscapes were made to reincorporate greenbelts and waterways that had existed since the Edo period so as to create ample urban spaces in harmony with history, even as international brandnames and high profile corporations were called in to underscore the cosmopolitan image of these major cities.

In fact, the effects of globalization have been felt equally in Tokyo and in regional cities, with more and more foreign architects and designers taking a visibly active role in the establishment of transnational corporate presence throughout Japan. At the same time, many more Japanese architects also became active abroad, and not just in Asia, but in the West as well, winning international competitions to realize ambitious public projects in Europe and America.

Urban Cycles
Center and Periphery

KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
KISHO KUROKAWA ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES
Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia 1998

JR KYOTO STATION BUILDING
HIROSHI HARA + ATELIERÉ
Simogyou, Kyoto, Japan 1997

OSANBASHI YOKOHAMA INTERNATIONAL PASSENGER
TERMINAL
FARSHID MOUSSAVI + ALEJANDRO ZAERA POLO / FOA
Yokohama, Kanagawa Pref., Japan 2002

SUBWAY STATION / IIDABASHI
MAKOTO SEI WATANABE / ARCHITECTS OFFICE
Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan 2000

TOKI MESSE NIIGATA CONVENTION CENTER / BANDAIJIMA BUILDING
FUMIHIKO MAKI KAJIMA DESIGN
Niigata, Niigata Pref., Japan 2003

BIG PALETTE FUKUSHIMA
ATSUSHI KITAGAWARA ARCHITECTS
Koriyama, Fukushima Pref., Japan 1998

JAPAN PAVILION, EXPO 2000, HANNOVER
SHIGERU BAN ARCHITECTS
Hannover, Germany 2000

TOYOTA GROUP PAVILION FOR EXPO 2005, AICHI, JAPAN
MIKAN
Aichi Pref., Japan 2005

ROPPONGI HILLS
MORI BUILDING Co., Ltd. IRIE MIYAKE ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS
YAMASHITA SEKKEI Inc. NIKKEN HOUSING SYSTEM Inc. and others
Minato, Tokyo, Japan 2003

OMOTESANDO HILLS
TADAO ANDO ARCHITECT & AND ASSOCIATES, MORI BUILDING
Co., Ltd DESIGN ENTITY
Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan 2006

MARUNOUCHI BUILDING
MITSUBISHI JISHO SEKKEI Inc.
Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan 2002

DENTSU HEADQUARTERS BUILDING
OBAYASHY CORPORATION ATELIERS JEAN NOUVEL
THE JERDE PARTNERSHIP INTERNATIONAL INC
Minato, Tokyo, Japan 2002

TAKENAKA CORPORATION TOKIO MAIN OFFICE
TAKENAKA CORPORATION
Koto, Tokyo, Japan 2004

NIKKEN SEKKEI TOKIO BUILDING
NIKKEN SEKKEI Ltd.
Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan 2003

TIANJIN MUSEUM
KAWAGUCHI AND ENGINEERS + SHIN TAKAMATSU
ARCHITECTS AND ASSOCIATES
Tianjin, China 2004

JIAN WAI SOHO
Masterplan: RIKEN YAMAMOTO & FIELD SHOP
Phase 1&2: RIKEN YAMAMOTO & FIELD SHOP KAZUHIRO
KOJIMA + MASAO KOIZUMI + KAZUKO AKAMATSU / C + A
MIKAN pase 3: RIKEN YAMAMOTO & FIELD SHOP and others
Beijing, China 2004 (phase 1, 2, 3), 2007 (all phases)

UKAWA SPA YOSHINO NO SATO
ATELIER ZO
Kyotango, Kyoto Pref., Japan 2001

UMI TSUBAKI HAYAMA
YOSHIJI TAKEHARA / MOO ARCHITECT WORKSHOP
Shirahama, Wakayama Pref., Japan 1999

LOUIS VUITTON NAGOYA
JUN AOKI & ASSOCIATES (main unit and exterior)
Nagoya, Aichi Pref., Japan 1999

LOUIS VUITTON KOCHI
OFFICE OF KUMIKO INUI
Kochi, Kochi Pref., Japan 2003

MAISON HERMÈS
RENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOP
RENA DUMAS ARCHITECTURE INTERIÉURE
ARUP TAKENAKA CORPORATION
Chuo, Tokyo Japan 2001

PRADA BOUTIQUE AOYAMA
HERZOG & DE MEURON TAKENAKA CORPORATION
Minato, Tokyo, Japan 2003

MEGURO CITY OFFICE BUILDING
Renewal design: YASUI ARCHITECT & ENGINEERS, Inc.
(Original design: MURANO MORI ARCHITECTS)
Meguro, Tokyo, Japan 2003

YAME CITY MULTI GENERATION CENTER
SHIGERU AOKI ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES
Yame, Fukuoka Pref., Japan 2001

ART PLAZA
ARATA ISOSAKI & ASSOCIATES YAMAMOTO
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN LAB
Oita, Oita Pref., Japan 1977

KITAKYUSHU EX-MOJI CUSTOMS HOUSE
HIDETOSHI OHNO + A.P.L
Kitakyuushuu, Fukuoka Pref., Japan 1994

ARTE PIAZZA BIBAI
KAN YASUDA
Bibai, Hokkaido, Japan 1992-2006

VALEO UNISIA TRANSMISSIONS
NORIAKI OKABE ARCHITECTURE NETWORK
Atsugi, Kanagawa Pref., Japan 2000

Life Cycles
From Cradle to Grave

Buildings are only really complete once people start to use them, as indeed their programs correspond to various aspects of people´s lives. In recent years, designs for public facilities have come to reflect user affiliations and backgrounds in ever more minute particulars, becoming fully handicap accessible and otherwise trying to accommodate more people.

Educational facilities, sports, sports facilities, health care facilities, hospitals and homes for the elderly, the basic provisions for each region reflect changes in society in the radical way their planning has changed. This clearly relates to the fact that, as of 2005, Japan´s population has actually started to decline, a classic “again society” scenario: assuming to the current 1.25 birthrate continues, the population will be halved in a hundred years´ time. We are already seeing the serious effects of fewer children in the closing of primary and secondary schools, as well as in fewer full-time university positions. Any new schools now planned must not only double as regional disaster relief shelters, but also premise contingency conversion to care centers for the elderly. On the other hand, despite university matriculation now exceeding 50% and institutions of tertiary education (junior colleges included) numbering upwards of 1200 nationwide, no foreseeable further increases in enrollment has seen no new universities established since last year.

Even so, as fostering new areas of specialization (“barrier free”) becomes an increasingly important concern, regional authorities have begun to push for new universities to educate such specialist. In recent years, the very structure of society has shifted from an economic growth-oriented profit pursuit model toward loosely knit networks of noon-profit organizations and the like, and now furthermore stresses finding meaning through charitable volunteer works. Such networks encourage the creation of spaces and facilities for participatory collaboration not previously provided for under existing schemes of commissioning, sometimes even promoting volunteer activities aboard.

While Japan generally tends toward religious tolerance, allowing many different faiths to co-exist, most Japanese characteristically show little adherence to religion in their daily lives. Even so, religious centers have played a large role in our cities, adding traditional charm to the cityscape. Protected groves of trees in temple and shrine precincts have likewise contributed greatly to greening the urban environment. Although Christians count for only about 1% of the population, their social influence is considerable. Similary, we find many sectarian adherents to “new religions,” as well as a slowly increasing, largely urban-dwelling Islamic population arriving from Asia in recent years.

Life Cycles
From Cradle to Grave

SHIROKANE KINDERGARTEN
MITSUHIRO SUDA / SUDA ARCHITECTS
Minato, Tokyo, Japan 2000

KINDERGARTEN IN YATSUSHIRO MIKAN
Yatsushiro, Kumamoto Pref., Japan 2001

FUKUSHIMA PREFECTURAL KORIYAMA SCHOOL FOR THE PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED – LIGHT SCHOOL
KAZUO WATABE / YUI ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS
Koriyama, Fukushima Pref., Japan 2001

KAZE NO WA-WIND CIRCLE-
JUN IGARASHI ARCHITECTS
Tokoro, Hokkaido, Japan 2003

LILLE INTERNATIONAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SHINOBU AKAHORI MICHELLE DUPERIER
JEAN CHRISTOPHE LERICHE
Lille, France 1996

HAKATA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NARAYA COMMUNITY
CENTER
KAZUMI KUDO + HIROSHI HORIBA / COELACANTH K&H
ARCHITECTS Inc.
Hakata, Fukoka Pref., Japan 2001

LIBERAL ARTS & SCIENCE COLLEGE
KAZUHIRO KOJIMA + KUZUKO AKAMATZU /CAT
Master plan: ARATA ISOZAKI + i- NET
Doha, Qatar 2004

BUDDHA PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL
AAF (ASIAN ARCHITECTURE FRIENDSHIP)
Philim, Sirdibas, Gorkha, Nepal 2003

GLASS HOUSE
KEN YOKOGAWA ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES Inc.
Tsuyama, Okayama Pref., Japan 1998

CHUGEI HIGH SCHOOL MARTIAL ARTS GYM
HISAMI YAMAMOTO & ASSOCIATES
Aki, Kochi Pref., Japan 1995

MIYAGI STADIUM
SHOICHI HARIU + HITOSHI ABE + HARIU and ABE
COLLABORATIVE ATELIER
Rifu, Miyagi Pref., Japan 2000

FORESTRY HALL TOMOCHI
TAIRA NISHIZAWA ARCHITECTS
Tomochi, Kumamoto Pref., Japan 2004

SAITAMA PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY
RIKEN YAMAMOTO & FIELD SHOP
Koshigaya, Saitama Pref., Japan 1999

TSURU GAKUEN YACHIYO CAMPUS, CAMPANELLA
TORU MURAKAMI ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES
Akitaka, Hiroshima Pref., Japan 2000

NAGOYA UNIVERSITY NOYORI MATERIALS SCIENCE
LABORATORY AND NOYORY CONFERENCE HALL
IIDA ARCHISHIP STUDIO
Chigusa, Aichi Pref., Japan 2003

KEIO UNIVERSITY MITA SOUTH BUILDING
TAISEI CORPORATION MICHEL DESVIGNE PAYSAGISTE DPLG KENGO KUMA & ASSOCIATES
Minato, Tokyo, Japan 2005

KATTA PUBLIC GENERAL HOSPITAL
TARO ASHIHARA ARCHITECTS KOH KITAYAMA + ARCHITECTURE WORK SHOP
HIDETO HORIIKE + ASSOCIATES
Shiroishi, Miyagi Pref., Japan 2002

CHILDREN’S CENTER FOR PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION
SOU FUJIMOTO ARCHITECTS
Date, Hokkaido, Japan 2006

NANOHANAKAN SENIOR CENTER (THE KAGOSIMA COMMUNITY CENTER FOR SENIORS)
TAKASAKI MASAHARU TAKASAKI ARCHITECTS
Ibusuki, Kagosima Pref., Japan 1998

HIRATA TOWN CENTER
YUZURU TOMINAGA + FORMSYSTEM INSTITUTE
Sakata, Yamagata Pref., Japan 2002

NAKA URIZURA CREMATORY
KUME SEKKEI / YOSHIHIKO KUWAHARA, KATSUYUKI UEDA, AKIHIKO ITO
Naka, Ibaraki Pref., Japan 2001

TSUKUSHI- NO-OKA FUNERAL HALL (ROOFTECTURE C)
SHUHEI ENDO ARCHITECT INSTITUTE
TahisI Hyogo Pref., Japan 2002

A GRAVEYARD IN KAMAKURA
Y. IKEHARA ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES
Kamakura, Kanagawa Pref., Japan 2002

KAZE-NO-OKA CREMATORIUM
MAKI AND ASSOCIATES
Nakatsu, Oita Pref., Japan 1997

CHURCH Y MAKOTO SHIN WATANABE & YOKO KINOSHITA / ADH ARCHITECTS
Sakura, Chiba Pref., Japan 2000

ST. IGNATIUS CHURCH
SAKAKURA ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS
Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan 1999

WHITE TEMPLE
TAKASHI YAMAGUCHI & ASSOCIATES
Sonobe, Kyoto Pref., Japan 2000

KANNONJI TEMPLE
WASEDA UNIVERSITY OSAMU ISHIYAMA LABORATORY
Shinjuku, Tokio, Japan 1996

MEIJI- JINGU MAIN OFFICE (SYAMUSHO)
SHIMIZU CORPORATION
Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan 2002

KUHONJI BUDDHISTS TEMPLE GATE AND OSSUARY,
MAIN PRAYER HALL
FURUICHI & ASSOCIATES + TOMO HOUSE
Sasebo, Nagasaki Pref., Japan 2003

HIROSHIMA NATIONAL PEACE MEMORIAL HALL FOR THE ATOMIC BOMB VICTIMS
CHUGOKU REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUREAU
KENZO TANGE ASSOCIATES
Hiroshima, Hiroshima Pref., Japan 2002

NAGASAKI NATIONAL PACE MEMORIAL HALL FOR THE ATOMIC BOMB VICTIMS
KYUSYU REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUREAU
A. KURYU ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES
Nagasaki, Nagasaki Pref., Japan 2003

Culture
Environment, Information, Art

Although Japan´s cultural budget hardly measures up to those of their industrialized countries- France, for instance, devotes 1% of its national budget to art and culture, whereas Japan allots a scant 0.12%-there is considerable popular interest in culture here, as seen by our large museum-and theater-going public. The reason being that, rather than national government taking a direct leading role in cultural administration, funding is structured so that the various regional authorities and local civic organizations receive public support for carrying out actual activities.

Some authorities have even gone ahead and constructed bold new cultural venues as part of active cultured-oriented programs to foster regional growth based on culture; one such success story, the 21st. Century Museum of Contemporary Art, Kanazawa, receives a hundred thousand visitors a month. Although conversely the issue of regional revitalizations remains a sore issue for authorities in waning locales, so in not a few instances they have drawn criticism for using national assistance funding to construct facilities disproportionate to the scale of local financial and governmental bodies. We even see art being utilized as a strategy for regional development: many local governments have emulated the Kumamoto Artpolis project of the late 1980s; the Echigo-Tsumari Art Triennial, for example, offers many facilities to international artists. And in a parallel trend, Japanese architects now play a major role in designing museums around the globe: particulary noteworthy are Tadao Ando’s Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth and Yosiho Taniguchi’s MoMA New York, while Shigeru Ban and SANAA (Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa) are currently working to build competition-winning designs in France (the new Centre Pompidou at Metz and the Louvre Annex at Lens, respectively).

With increasing ecological awareness in recent years, art and environmentally are not closely interrelated. So much so that environmentally integrated projects are often more highly appreciated than individual buildings, as seen in such massive undertakings as Moerenuma Park conceived by Issamu Noguchi, which transformed an entire area of Sapporo. The boundary between artist and architect is blurring, as people of diverse professions meet in the middle ground of landscaping.

Likewise, the media sector plays an extremely important role in “culture business” indeed, with today’s advances in information technology, that role is increasing more than ever before, calling for new node facilities both in Tokyo and in outlying regions alike. Each prefecture, moreover, is rapidly establishing or inviting in universities and research centers, business empowerment facilities, convention centers and IT enterprises, although due to varying degrees of support from local authorities, the foundations afforded by local industry, connections to international networks and other factors, successes are few as yet.

Culture Cycles
Environment, Information, Art

SHOWA KINEN PARK HANAMIDORI CULTURAL CENTER
Principal design: MASAKASU SUZUKI + MOMOYO KAIJIMA
Architectural design: ITO + KUWAHARA + KANEBAKO + KANKYO ENGINEER HANAMIDORI CUKTURAL CENTER
DESING TEAM + ATELIER BOW-WOW
Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan 2005

MAKINO MUSEUM OF PLANTS AND PEOPLE
HIROSHI NAITO / NAITO ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES
Kochi, Kochi Pref., Japan 1999

ECHIGO-MATSUNOYAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCE
TAKAHURU + YUI TEZUKA / TEZUKA ARCHITECTS
MASAHIRO IKEDA / MASAHIRO IKEDA Co., Ltd.
TEZUKA LAB AT MUSASHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Tokamachi, Niagata Pref., Japan 2003

GUDIANCE CENTER OF KATSUYAMATATE MEDIEVAL FORT SITE
PLANNING INSTITUTE FOR CONSERVATION OF CULTURAL PROPERTIES HIROSE LABORATORY
Kaminokuni, Hokkaido., Japan 2004

MOERENUMA PARK
Master plan: ISAMU NOGUCHI
Supervisor: ISAMU NOGUCHI FUNDATION
Executive architect: ARCHITECT 5 PARTNERSHIP
Landscape architect: KITABA LANDSCAPE PLANNING
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan 2005

HELSINKI 2000 ART GARDEN
Supervisor: TADAYASU SAKAI
Installation: KEIJI UEMATSU, MASAAKI NISHI, TAKAMASA KUNIYASU, MASAFUMI MAITA, KIMIO TSUCHIYA, KAZUO MAKIOKA, SHIGEO TOYA
Helsinki, Finland 2000

TOKIO NATIONAL MUSEUM, THE GALLERY OF HORYUJI TREASURES
TANIGUCHI AND ASSOCIATES
Taitou, Tokyo Japan 1999

21ST CENTURY MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART
KANAZAWA
KASUYO SEJIMA + RYUE NISHISAWA /SANAA
Kanasawa, Ishikawa pref.., Japan 2004

MODERN ART MUSEUM OF FORT WORTH
TADDAO ANDO ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES KENDALL / HEATON ASSOCIATES
Fort Worth, Texas U.S.A 2002

NAKAGAWA- MACHI BATO HIROSHIGE MUSEUM OF ART KENGO KUMA & ASSOCIATES
Bato, Nakagawa-machi, Tochigi Pref., Japan 2000

AKIO FUKU MUSEUM
TERUNOBU FUJIMORI + YOSHIO UCHIDA (SHUSAKUSHA)
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Pref., Japan 1997

AOMORI MUSEUM OF ART
JUN AOKI & ASSOCIATES
Aomori, Aomori Pref., Japan 2006

POLA MUSEUM OF ART
KOISHI YASUDA, NIKKEN SEKKEI Ltd.
Hakone, Kanagawa Pref., Japan 2002

TOMIHIRO ART MUSEUM
AAT + MAKOTO YOKOMIZO, ARCHITECTS
Midori, Gunma Pref., Japan 2005

BIANIMALE NOMADIC MUSEUM
SHIGERU BAN ARCHITECTS
New York, U.S.A. 2005

THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART (MoMA)
TANIGUCHI AND ASSOCIATES
New York, U.S.A. 2004

NEW NATIONAL THEATRE TOKYO
TAKAHIKO YANAGISAWA + TAK ARCHITECTS INC
Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan 1997

REHIOKU COMMUNITY HALL
HITOSHI ABE + YUSUAKI ONODA + ATELIER HITOSHI ABE
Reihoku, kumamoto Pref., Japan 2002

NARA CENTENNIAL HALL
ARATA ISOZAKI & ASSOCIATES
Nara, Nara Pref., Japan 1998

MIRASAKA CERAMICS STUDIO
HIDEKI YOSHIMATSU /ARCHIPRO ARCHITECTS
Miyoshi Hiroshima Pref., Japan 2000

WAKANOURA ART CUBE
TAKETO SHIMOHIGOSHI /A.A.E
Wakayama, Wakayama Pref., Japan 2003

IZUMI VILLAGE CENTER
KOJI TAKAEDA & ASSOCIATES + LOGOS ARCHITECT & PARTNERS
Izumi, Kumamoto Pref., Japan 1997

KAMIYUBETSU FOLK MUSEUM
TOYOKAZU WATANABE ARCHITECTURE STUDIO
Kamiyubetsu, Hokkaido, Japan 1996

REVERSIBLE DESTINY LOFTS MITAKA – IN MEMORY OF HELEN KELLER
ARAKAWA + GINS WITH YASU ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Inc.
Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan 2005

“NO BUTAI” SNOW – LAND AGRARIAN CULTURE CENTER, MATSUDAI
MVRDV SUPER – 05 ARCHITECTS OFFICE CLIP
Matsudai, Niigata Pref., Japan 2003

KANSAI – KAN OF THE NATIONAL DIET LIBRARY
FUMIO TOKI / FUMIO TOKI ASSOCIATES
Seika Kyoto, Japan 2002

SENDAI MDIATHEQUE
TOYO ITO & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS
Sendai, Miyagui Pref., Japan 2000

SOFTOPIA JAPAN DREAM CORE
TADASU OHE / PLANTEC ARCHITECTS INC
Ogaki, Gifu Pref., Japan 2000

FCG (FUJI SANKEI COMUNICATIONS GROUP)
HEADQUARTERS BUILDING
KENZO TANGE ASSOCIATES
Minato, Tokyo Japan 1996

Living Cycles
Conformity or Division

Dwellings are basic to survival, and also directly reflect people’s cultures and customs. The habitable parts of Japan where some 120 million people concentrate, however, amount to a mere one-third of the total land area. Here we find a basic framework of Edo Period cities overlaid since the mid-Meiji Era with steadily expanding suburbs, yet even these residential areas are still densely packed with houses. All of which makes for the exhorbitant real estate prices: the value of the land far exceeds that of anything one could possibly build on it. Moreover, the average Japanese house has a life expectancy of just 26 years as compared to 75 years for the English home-not principally due to any technical reasons, but simply because the mortgage value of a woodframe house plummets to zero after only twenty years.

While houses were typically made of wood thoughout most of Japanese history, public housing blocks were first erected during the reconstruction after World War II, followed by housing built by private developers from the 1960s on, hence group housing is a relatively new phenomenon here: Japan is now only in its second generation of apartment living. On the other hand, the housing industry that emerged since the 1960s has completely altered the Japanese housing market, although eight tenths of the approximately 1.1 million unit annual housing supply built using traditional construction methods versus two tenths by prefabrication. The housing industry has become a stable field, in which over forty thousand “big game” and “small time” housing professionals compete nationwide, assisted by a reputed two-hundred-thousand certified first class architects.

In that sense, whether or not an architect´s proposed design succeeds largely depends on how the industry relates to user needs, not to mention how seamlessly the production-supply system meshes with the design and execution processes, what new materials or techniques can be employed in cramped city lots, whether old materials or buildings can be effectively recycled- whatever, the task requires formidable strategic thinking. Toward this end, rather than manufacturers of standardized housing, recent trends include small independent groups of architects and engineers networking via the internet to deliver more responsive solutions.

Given society´s avowed goal of convivial affluent living, we are also seeing greater appreciation of traditional Japanese style quarters than ever before; much sought after are architects who prove adept at handling the precision woodworking and joinery techniques demanded by traditional sukiya architecture and at adapting new materials to a more up to-date take on sukiya stylings. Indeed, as one last note of interest, the old Japanese “fushin doraku” (consummate dilettant) literal of total self- realization through building one’s “dream house” seems to be alive and well, finding renewed expression in vacation homes and contemporary tea ceremony rooms.

Living Cycles
Conformity or Division

HOUSE SURGERY
KATSUHIRO MIYAMOTO & ASSOCIATES
Takarazuka, Hyogo Pref., Japan 1997

s-tube
ARATA NAYA
Chigasaki, Kanagawa Pref.., Japan 1999

C HOUSE THÉA-ORY HOUSE NKM
C house: KEI´ICHI IRE + POWER UNIT STUDIO Théa-ory
House: HIROSHI MARUYAMA
nkm: AKIRA YONEDA / ARCHITECTON MASAHIRO IKEDA / MASAHIRO IKEDA Co., Ltd.
Producer: Masahiro Ouchi
Arakawa, Tokyo, Japan 2001

9TUBO HOUSE (SUMIREAOI HOUSE)
MAKOTO KOIZUMI / KOIZUMI STUDIO
Producer: YASUYUKI OKAZAKI / COMMEDESIGN INC.
Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan 1999

HU-TONG HOUSE
WARO KISHI + K. ASSOCIATES / ARCHITECTS
Japan 2002

ALMIUM ECO-MATERIAL HOUSE
KAZUHIKO NAMBA + KAI WORKSHOP
Tsukuba, Ibaraki Pref., Japan 1999

W-HOUSE
AKIRA WATANABE ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES
Meguro, Tokyo, Japan 2000

HAKUEI RESIDENCE
CASA AKIRA SAKAMOTO ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES
Minoh, Osaka Pref., Japan 1996

HOUSE SA 1999
KAZUNARI SAKAMOTO ARCHITECTURAL LABORATORY
Kawasaki, Kanagawa Pref., Japan 1999

LAYER HOUSE
HIROAI OTHANI
Kobe, Kyogo Pref., Japan 2003

HOUSE IN A PLUM GROVE
KAZUYO SEJIMA & ASSOCIATES
Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan 2003

HAKAMA
JUN TAMAKI /TAMAKI ARCHITECTURAL ATELIER
Uji, Kyoto Pref., Japan 1998

TAKASUGI-AN (TOO- HIGH TEHAOUSE)
TERUNOBU FUJIMORI
Chino, Nagano Pref., Japan 2004

SETEGAYA MURA VILLAGE
WASEDA UNIVERSITY ISHIYAMA OSAMU LABORATORY
Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan 2001

NATURAL ERIPPS
MASAKI ENDOH /ENDOH DESIGN CENTER HOUSE
MASAHIRO IKEDA / MASAHIRO IKEDA Co. Ltd.
Shibuya, Tokio, Japan 2002

CRYSTAL BRICK
HIRO YAMASHITA + ATELIER TEKUTO
JUN SATO / JUN SATO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan 2004

PIPA-AN
KAN IZUE / IZUE ARCHITECT ASSOCIATES
Takarazuka, Hyogo Pref., Japan 1999

FUKYO
HIROYUKI ARIMA + URBAN FOURTH
Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi Pref., Japan 2001

WEEKEND HOUSE
OFFICE OF RYUE NISHIZAWA
Gunma Pref., Japan 1998

AIR HOUSE
SAMBUICHI ARCHITECTS
Hagi, Yamaguchi Pref., Japan 2001

MANGETSUKYO
YUTAKA SAITO + MASARU MIYAZONO
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan 1996

ARC SHAPED EXTENTION
TOMOYUKI UTSIMI / MILLIGRAM STUDIO
Karuizawa, Nagano Pref., Japan 2004

| arriba |

| Programa general | Instituto Cultural Cabañas |